MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics99.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive90.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C37
MotherboardMSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37)  (all builds)
Memory26.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200109
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 04 '24 at 13:38
Run Duration210 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$86
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Memory 72.6
1-Core 134
2-Core 270
85% 159 Pts
4-Core 520
8-Core 872
85% 696 Pts
64-Core 1,066
66% 1,066 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510
Nvidia(10DE 1F06) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
99.5% Outstanding
Lighting 120
Reflection 112
Parallax 124
98% 119 fps
MRender 179
Gravity 108
Splatting 103
103% 130 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 99.5%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate BarraCuda 120 SSD ZA500CM10003 500GB
350GB free (System drive)
Firmware: STRSD013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 197 193 211 201 208 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
90.3% Outstanding
Read 370
Write 372
Mixed 358
SusWrite 203
73% 326 MB/s
4K Read 39.2
4K Write 83.1
4K Mixed 51.8
170% 58 MB/s
DQ Read 250
DQ Write 198
DQ Mixed 223
167% 224 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 90.3%
Great: 136%
Sabrent Rocket 4 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$100
786GB free
Firmware: RKT401.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3183 3599 3637 3684 3746 3693 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
430% Outstanding
Read 2,144
Write 1,987
Mixed 2,245
SusWrite 3,590
565% 2,492 MB/s
4K Read 46.5
4K Write 150
4K Mixed 74
245% 90.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,293
DQ Write 892
DQ Mixed 1,054
797% 1,080 MB/s
Poor: 189%
This bench: 430%
Great: 486%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$47
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 178 176 180 192 185 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
89.9% Excellent
Read 132
Write 182
Mixed 75
SusWrite 181
104% 143 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
110% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX3200C16D4/8GX KHX3200C16D4/16GX KHX3200C16D4/8GX 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 16384, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.4% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 15.9
MC Mixed 15.9
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 17.6
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 94.8
42% 94.8 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 46 10 144 31.5" 2560 1369 VSCDE35 VX3258 series
Typical MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) Builds (Compare 10,543 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) - $179

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,012
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback