Lenovo 21H5CTO1WW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics7.12% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive294% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 21H5CTO1WW  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 21H5CTO1WW
Memory55.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240318
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 04 '24 at 11:55
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U Graphics
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
59.3% Above average
Memory 56.6
1-Core 121
2-Core 217
71% 132 Pts
4-Core 334
8-Core 477
51% 406 Pts
64-Core 483
30% 483 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Legend(17AA 50BF) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 22.40.72.02
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
7.12% Terrible
Lighting 7.5
Reflection 12.7
Parallax 12.3
6% 10.8 fps
MRender 10.9
Gravity 10.3
Splatting 11.8
9% 11 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.12%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD PC SN740 SDDQMQD-1T00-1201 1TB
786GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 73116101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1758 1778 1794 2009 1646 1645 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
294% Outstanding
Read 2,469
Write 2,242
Mixed 1979
SusWrite 1,772
475% 2,115 MB/s
4K Read 55.3
4K Write 86.3
4K Mixed 59.9
206% 67.2 MB/s
DQ Read 632
DQ Write 433
DQ Mixed 520
392% 529 MB/s
Poor: 140%
This bench: 294%
Great: 514%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A4G43BB1-CWE 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
67.8% Good
MC Read 24.2
MC Write 25.4
MC Mixed 24.6
71% 24.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 26.9
SC Mixed 20.9
59% 20.8 GB/s
Latency 140
29% 140 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 23: 0P 2R 4G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
23% 12% 58 132 57 60 14" 1296 759 LEN40A9
Typical 21H5CTO1WW Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 21H5CTO1WW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback