Asrock B365M-ITX/ac

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics69.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive309% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsrock B365M-ITX/ac  (all builds)
Memory9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200514
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 04 '24 at 09:42
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-9100F-$115
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
77.6% Very good
Memory 82
1-Core 120
2-Core 237
81% 146 Pts
4-Core 422
8-Core 425
56% 424 Pts
64-Core 418
26% 418 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$200
CLim: 2220 MHz, MLim: 2100 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
69.9% Good
Lighting 90.7
Reflection 93.3
Parallax 89.7
74% 91.2 fps
MRender 69.6
Gravity 82.4
Splatting 75.5
62% 75.8 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 73%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA2000M8500G 500GB
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S5Z42105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 36 39 38 35 35 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
309% Outstanding
Read 2,430
Write 42.7
Mixed 87.9
SusWrite 36.3
135% 649 MB/s
4K Read 518
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 4.8
793% 175 MB/s
Poor: 118%
This bench: 309%
Great: 277%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFS8266.C8FE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70.8% Very good
MC Read 25.8
MC Write 27.6
MC Mixed 22.4
72% 25.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 25.5
SC Mixed 21.6
59% 20.6 GB/s
Latency 73.9
54% 73.9 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 55: 0P 5R 9G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
55% 40% 42 91 58 165 23.8" 1280 720 ACR082E XV240Y
Typical B365M-ITX/ac Builds (Compare 318 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asrock B365M-ITX/ac

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback