Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ELITE WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics92.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive86% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ELITE WIFI  (all builds)
Memory25.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20191206
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 04 '24 at 05:27
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$200
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
87.9% Excellent
Memory 70.6
1-Core 145
2-Core 288
89% 168 Pts
4-Core 562
8-Core 1,061
97% 812 Pts
64-Core 1,471
91% 1,471 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$250
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 24.4.1
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
92.9% Outstanding
Lighting 115
Reflection 191
Parallax 209
94% 172 fps
MRender 113
Gravity 132
Splatting 94.6
91% 113 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 92.9%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$98
134GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 439 110 81 82 82 81 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
86% Excellent
Read 500
Write 447
Mixed 402
SusWrite 146
84% 374 MB/s
4K Read 33.1
4K Write 87.3
4K Mixed 45.6
155% 55.3 MB/s
DQ Read 216
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 196
148% 199 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 86%
Great: 121%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$98
661GB free
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 443 441 438 441 441 442 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 448
Mixed 404
SusWrite 441
101% 449 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 89.1
4K Mixed 45.1
154% 55.6 MB/s
DQ Read 217
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 198
149% 199 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 104%
Great: 121%
Seagate FireCuda HDD 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 0003
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 129 129 127 129 130 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
71.1% Very good
Read 120
Write 99.2
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 128
75% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.1
218% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 69%
WD Game Drive 4TB
3TB free, PID 262f
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 38 38 37 38 38 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
24% Poor
Read 50
Write 37.2
Mixed 31
SusWrite 37.5
51% 38.9 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
128% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 24%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-3200C16-8GTZR F4-3600C16-8GTZNC F4-3200C16-8GTZR F4-3600C16-8GTZNC 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66.6% Good
MC Read 26.5
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 26.3
67% 23.6 GB/s
SC Read 21.3
SC Write 17.8
SC Mixed 26.7
63% 21.9 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 50 16 100 35" 1280 720 AUS3554 ASUS VG35V
Typical GA-X570 AORUS ELITE WIFI Builds (Compare 6,672 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 181%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ELITE WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 107% - Outstanding Total price: $687
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback