Pcspecialist Recoil VIII 17

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.06% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemPcspecialist Recoil VIII 17  (all builds)
MotherboardTongFang GM7IX7N
Memory22.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240409
Uptime4.6 Days
Run DateMay 04 '24 at 03:55
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-14900HX
U3E1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
74.7% Very good
Memory 74.3
1-Core 138
2-Core 276
87% 163 Pts
4-Core 411
8-Core 552
61% 481 Pts
64-Core 880
54% 880 Pts
Poor: 110%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(1D05 1399) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4887
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
6.06% Terrible
Lighting 6.8
Reflection 10
Parallax 6.9
6% 7.9 fps
MRender 9.2
Gravity 9.4
Splatting 7.7
7% 8.77 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.06%
Great: 10%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$170
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QJXD7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,925
Write 1,559
Mixed 1,755
389% 1,746 MB/s
4K Read 51.8
4K Write 76
4K Mixed 58.1
193% 62 MB/s
DQ Read 540
DQ Write 207
DQ Mixed 385
282% 377 MB/s
Poor: 310% Great: 583%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMS5X16G1A48C40A2-PC 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
55.2% Above average
MC Read 20.2
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 20.4
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 33.3
SC Mixed 22.3
67% 23.5 GB/s
Latency 92.8
43% 92.8 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 156%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 46 12 240 17" 1280 720 BOE0A99
Typical Recoil VIII 17 Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 238%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 119%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 290%
UFO

System: Pcspecialist Recoil VIII 17

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 127% - Outstanding Total price: $123
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback