TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

18291729127396 93374568807396

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive80.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
System18291729127396 93374568807396  (all builds)
Motherboard57079704947399 14628385647399
Memory21.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210413
Uptime2 Days
Run DateMay 04 '24 at 00:24
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
75.6% Very good
Memory 86.2
1-Core 111
2-Core 204
77% 134 Pts
4-Core 359
8-Core 464
52% 412 Pts
64-Core 477
30% 477 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑
This bench: 75.6%
 Great: 84%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8TN8U256G1001 256GB
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X4133101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 163 141 151 139 152 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
80.9% Excellent
Read 454
Write 293
Mixed 219
SusWrite 151
62% 279 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 68.1
4K Mixed 38.5
133% 45.9 MB/s
DQ Read 322
DQ Write 231
DQ Mixed 193
167% 249 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑
This bench: 80.9%
 Great: 90%
Intel SSDSC2BB016T6K 1.5TB
745GB free
Firmware: G201CS01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 412 416 408 413 411 417 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
85.7% Excellent
Read 313
Write 411
Mixed 301
SusWrite 413
81% 359 MB/s
4K Read 27.2
4K Write 65.5
4K Mixed 34.4
120% 42.4 MB/s
DQ Read 272
DQ Write 213
DQ Mixed 233
177% 239 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑
This bench: 85.7%
 Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3200 Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 DDR4 3200 Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
77.7% Very good
MC Read 27.7
MC Write 30.5
MC Mixed 25.1
79% 27.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 29.5
SC Mixed 22.7
65% 22.7 GB/s
Latency 69.1
58% 69.1 ns
Poor: 70% ↑
This bench: 77.7%
 Great: 104%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 60 0" 1280 720
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback