Samsung 940X5N

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics8.29% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive67.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
SystemSamsung 940X5N  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP940X5N-X01US
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181123
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 04 '24 at 00:00
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8550U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
48.3% Average
Memory 57.9
1-Core 68
2-Core 135
50% 86.9 Pts
4-Core 210
8-Core 343
34% 276 Pts
64-Core 348
22% 348 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 540
Sanyo(144D C162) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 23.20.15036.0
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
8.29% Terrible
Lighting 9.6
Reflection 15.4
Parallax 12.8
8% 12.6 fps
MRender 11.2
Gravity 9.1
Splatting 12.8
9% 11 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.29%
Great: 13%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN256HAJQ-000 256GB
119GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MVT22K0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 323 307 301 225 186 187 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
67.2% Good
Read 344
Write 334
Mixed 318
SusWrite 255
70% 312 MB/s
4K Read 12.6
4K Write 46
4K Mixed 23.3
73% 27.3 MB/s
DQ Read 360
DQ Write 309
DQ Mixed 335
251% 335 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43BB1-CRC 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40% Below average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 12.5
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 15
SC Mixed 13.3
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 141
28% 141 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 40%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 8: 0P 1R 1G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
8% 18% 11 181 56 60 15" 1280 720 BOE071B
Typical 940X5N Builds (Compare 50 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 940X5N

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback