Gigabyte Z690 GAMING X DDR4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 136%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 139%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 109%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics124% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte Z690 GAMING X DDR4  (all builds)
Memory23.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211217
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 03 '24 at 20:03
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 24%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12600KF-$159
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Memory 84.2
1-Core 191
2-Core 381
114% 219 Pts
4-Core 716
8-Core 1,231
118% 973 Pts
64-Core 1,718
106% 1,718 Pts
Poor: 101%
This bench: 109%
Great: 117%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
Nvidia(10DE 12A6) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (54th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
124% Outstanding
Lighting 167
Reflection 166
Parallax 168
136% 167 fps
MRender 179
Gravity 146
Splatting 122
119% 149 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 124%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
176GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 373 296 297 298 298 295 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 491
Write 473
Mixed 377
SusWrite 310
93% 413 MB/s
4K Read 35.7
4K Write 82.3
4K Mixed 47.1
158% 55 MB/s
DQ Read 369
DQ Write 315
DQ Mixed 339
255% 341 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 103%
Great: 124%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$98
931GB free
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 440 479 475 480 479 479 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
99.8% Outstanding
Read 463
Write 477
Mixed 398
SusWrite 472
102% 452 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 83.8
4K Mixed 33.3
121% 46.4 MB/s
DQ Read 369
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 339
255% 342 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 99.8%
Great: 121%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$50
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 148 148 148 149 149 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Read 140
Write 103
Mixed 91.1
SusWrite 146
89% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
190% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 84%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
931GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 174 174 175 174 174 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 186
Write 160
Mixed 94.3
SusWrite 174
112% 153 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.2
247% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 103%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 3000 C15 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2933 MHz clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
99.5% Outstanding
MC Read 37.3
MC Write 36.7
MC Mixed 33.6
102% 35.9 GB/s
SC Read 23.6
SC Write 37.9
SC Mixed 30.5
88% 30.7 GB/s
Latency 73.6
54% 73.6 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 99.5%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 50: 0P 4R 5G 15B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
50% 47% 51 216 58 240 24.5" 1280 720 AUS25B1 ROG PG258Q
Typical GA-Z690 GAMING X DDR4 Builds (Compare 9,474 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 199%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 203%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z690 GAMING X DDR4 - $230

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $1,454
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback