Asrock B560M-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics74.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive63.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
25 days ago, 25 days ago.
MotherboardAsrock B560M-C  (all builds)
Memory14 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210208
Uptime23.4 Days
Run DateMay 03 '24 at 19:43
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11700F
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
96.2% Outstanding
Memory 84.4
1-Core 159
2-Core 310
99% 184 Pts
4-Core 580
8-Core 932
93% 756 Pts
64-Core 1,003
62% 1,003 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 96.2%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Lighting 94.1
Reflection 91.5
Parallax 85.5
77% 90.4 fps
MRender 114
Gravity 80.5
Splatting 73.3
71% 89.3 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Neo Forza NFS011SA351-6007000 512GB
145GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0910A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 295 79 127 76 32 79 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
63.6% Good
Read 446
Write 354
Mixed 322
SusWrite 115
69% 309 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 54.8
4K Mixed 21.8
97% 34.3 MB/s
DQ Read 162
DQ Write 275
DQ Mixed 37.6
80% 158 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 94%
Samsung 870 EVO 4TB-$370
3.5TB free
Firmware: SVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 345 423 422 420 433 432 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 476
Write 433
Mixed 420
SusWrite 412
98% 435 MB/s
4K Read 38.1
4K Write 93.2
4K Mixed 51.9
174% 61.1 MB/s
DQ Read 368
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 340
256% 342 MB/s
Poor: 90%
This bench: 114%
Great: 137%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
807GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 188 190 188 176 179 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 167
Write 61.5
Mixed 82.2
SusWrite 184
91% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
131% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 100%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$68
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66.6% Good
MC Read 32.4
MC Write 21.7
MC Mixed 17.9
69% 24 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 18.4
SC Mixed 17.7
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 73.5
54% 73.5 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 60 27" 1280 720 AUS27AF VG278
Typical B560M-C Builds (Compare 4,068 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 100%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 99%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asrock B560M-C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $283
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback