Asrock H610M-HVS/M.2 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 95%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics91.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive93.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock H610M-HVS/M.2 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory25.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230608
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 03 '24 at 18:45
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU 23%
Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12400F-$122
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
99.7% Outstanding
Memory 81.8
1-Core 178
2-Core 346
107% 202 Pts
4-Core 630
8-Core 1,020
101% 825 Pts
64-Core 1190
74% 1190 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 99.7%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$250
ASRock(1849 5103) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 24.4.1
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
91.7% Outstanding
Lighting 117
Reflection 185
Parallax 177
96% 160 fps
MRender 110
Gravity 113
Splatting 91
84% 104 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 104%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Netac 960GB 960GB
817GB free (System drive)
Firmware: W0714A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 391 416 416 410 410 411 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
93.2% Outstanding
Read 473
Write 412
Mixed 386
SusWrite 409
94% 420 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 21.3
135% 55.8 MB/s
DQ Read 142
DQ Write 308
DQ Mixed 31
79% 160 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 93.2%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Lexar Co Limited LD4BU016G-3200XG 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
106% Outstanding
MC Read 41.3
MC Write 38.9
MC Mixed 35.8
110% 38.7 GB/s
SC Read 22.9
SC Write 42.8
SC Mixed 28.1
89% 31.3 GB/s
Latency 76.7
52% 76.7 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 106%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 1 209 55 165 27.2" 1280 720 GSM5C4D LG ULTRAGEAR
Typical H610M-HVS/M.2 R2.0 Builds (Compare 295 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asrock H610M-HVS/M.2 R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $388
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback