MSI B450 Tomahawk

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics74.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive83.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
30 days ago, 29 days ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C02
MotherboardMSI B450 Tomahawk  (all builds)
Memory25.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191107
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 03 '24 at 16:26
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 53%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$145
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
53.6% Above average
Memory 72.5
1-Core 65.7
2-Core 121
53% 86.4 Pts
4-Core 191
8-Core 260
28% 226 Pts
64-Core 237
15% 237 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
74.2% Very good
Lighting 94.3
Reflection 94.8
Parallax 94.7
77% 94.6 fps
MRender 96.6
Gravity 86.9
Splatting 74.4
69% 86 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
169GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 344 351 345 343 345 342 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Read 497
Write 356
Mixed 293
SusWrite 345
83% 373 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 33.1
4K Mixed 28.9
103% 31.4 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 80.4
DQ Mixed 151
132% 206 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 129%
Fanxiang S101 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: W0220A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 127 129 128 127 127 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44.9% Average
Read 245
Write 129
Mixed 164
SusWrite 127
37% 166 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 22.5
4K Mixed 16.6
79% 23.1 MB/s
DQ Read 125
DQ Write 46
DQ Mixed 49.3
46% 73.6 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 109%
Maxone USB 3.0 500GB
1GB free
Firmware: 0209
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 41.7
Write 41.7
Mixed 28.7
28% 37.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
97% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 64%
WD Elements 2621 5TB
1.5TB free, PID 2621
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 74 74 74 74 74 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
39% Below average
Read 78.1
Write 68.6
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 73.5
92% 68.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 0.7
154% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 39%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2D3600C18 CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 CMK16GX4M2D3600C18 CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
70% Very good
MC Read 27.6
MC Write 23.6
MC Mixed 24.6
72% 25.3 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 23.4
SC Mixed 21.9
62% 21.5 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 70%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 24" 1280 720 PXO0243 Pixio PX248PA
Typical B450 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C02) Builds (Compare 7,356 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer

Motherboard: MSI B450 Tomahawk - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $687
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback