Asrock B75M-DGS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics25.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock B75M-DGS  (all builds)
Memory2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120730
Uptime12.3 Days
Run DateMay 03 '24 at 15:59
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3350P-$60
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
71% Very good
Memory 90.8
1-Core 82.6
2-Core 162
67% 112 Pts
4-Core 304
8-Core 267
39% 286 Pts
64-Core 281
17% 281 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 71%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Nvidia(10DE 11C0) 2GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 546.01
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.2% Poor
Lighting 31.3
Reflection 33.8
Parallax 31.5
26% 32.2 fps
MRender 36.3
Gravity 33.8
Splatting 23.5
25% 31.2 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 25.2%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 120GB-$109
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT07B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 29 30 30 29 29 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
37.5% Below average
Read 272
Write 42.1
Mixed 50.9
SusWrite 32.3
21% 99.2 MB/s
4K Read 15.2
4K Write 31.6
4K Mixed 12.7
56% 19.8 MB/s
DQ Read 316
DQ Write 39
DQ Mixed 43.3
66% 133 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 73%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
674GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 125 144 143 144 146 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
81.5% Excellent
Read 143
Write 131
Mixed 63.8
SusWrite 141
87% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.8
173% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
30.6% Below average
MC Read 10.9
MC Write 10.9
MC Mixed 9.5
30% 10.4 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 7.9
SC Mixed 8.3
22% 7.73 GB/s
Latency 88.5
45% 88.5 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 35%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 685 223 60 23.5" 1280 720 MED36D5 MD20435
Typical B75M-DGS Builds (Compare 196 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock B75M-DGS - $58

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $257
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback