Asus Z170-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics117% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Z170-A  (all builds)
Memory25.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150831
Uptime15.4 Days
Run DateMay 03 '24 at 15:49
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Memory 90.7
1-Core 122
2-Core 242
85% 152 Pts
4-Core 420
8-Core 660
67% 540 Pts
64-Core 659
41% 659 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
117% Outstanding
Lighting 157
Reflection 178
Parallax 163
128% 166 fps
MRender 127
Gravity 161
Splatting 116
108% 134 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 117%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
226GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 281 351 254 228 256 247 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 376
Write 411
Mixed 323
SusWrite 270
78% 345 MB/s
4K Read 36.6
4K Write 97.3
4K Mixed 54.6
177% 62.8 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 351
264% 355 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 103%
Great: 134%
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$150
45GB free
Firmware: 6B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 275 329 350 352 352 354 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
95.4% Outstanding
Read 438
Write 363
Mixed 269
SusWrite 335
79% 351 MB/s
4K Read 34
4K Write 88.5
4K Mixed 32.4
140% 51.6 MB/s
DQ Read 368
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 132
156% 272 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 95.4%
Great: 110%
WD WD5000AAKX-08U6AA0 1TB
693GB free
Firmware: 023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 276 354 408 420 421 378 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 451
Write 405
Mixed 390
SusWrite 376
301% 406 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 83.5
4K Mixed 40.7
7,394% 52 MB/s
DQ Read 255
DQ Write 122
DQ Mixed 155
1,520% 177 MB/s
Poor: 44% Great: 102%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$70
168GB free
Firmware: A3EA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 106 108 106 109 105 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
61.2% Good
Read 106
Write 94.2
Mixed 56.5
SusWrite 107
67% 91 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
131% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 74%
Toshiba P300 2TB-$61
1.5TB free
Firmware: ACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 179 179 179 179 180 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 191
Write 183
Mixed 35.7
SusWrite 179
106% 147 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.5
140% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 106%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Value DDR4 2400 C17 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73% Very good
MC Read 26
MC Write 27.6
MC Mixed 22.8
73% 25.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 29.1
SC Mixed 22.9
66% 23.2 GB/s
Latency 66
61% 66 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 73%
Great: 127%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 144 24" 1280 720 ACR050E Acer XB241H
Typical Z170-A Builds (Compare 8,845 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Z170-A - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $796
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback