Gigabyte GA-Z68X-UD3-B3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 96%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics113% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive66.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z68X-UD3-B3  (all builds)
Memory15.7 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120321
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 03 '24 at 14:39
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
Socket 1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 5.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
86.5% Excellent
Memory 91.8
1-Core 118
2-Core 231
84% 147 Pts
4-Core 448
8-Core 578
65% 513 Pts
64-Core 585
36% 585 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 2075 MHz, MLim: 2652 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Lighting 148
Reflection 150
Parallax 140
121% 146 fps
MRender 123
Gravity 150
Splatting 126
108% 133 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 113%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY SSD2SC120G1CS1754D117-483 120GB
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS111101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 248 288 289 223 289 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
66.2% Good
Read 359
Write 249
Mixed 224
SusWrite 257
61% 272 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 73.1
4K Mixed 28.8
107% 40.8 MB/s
DQ Read 27.1
DQ Write 116
DQ Mixed 38.5
39% 60.5 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 91%
Solid 256GB
138GB free
Firmware: SBFQP1B3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 270 199 118 117 117 MB/s
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
45.7% Average
Read 229
Write 162
Mixed 173
SusWrite 171
41% 184 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 38.7
4K Mixed 20.6
81% 27.2 MB/s
DQ Read 23.3
DQ Write 39.8
DQ Mixed 27.5
22% 30.2 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 87%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
403GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 121 122 122 123 122 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
68.2% Good
Read 116
Write 101
Mixed 50
SusWrite 122
71% 97.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.9
148% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
458GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 134 136 136 136 135 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
77.1% Very good
Read 134
Write 134
Mixed 55.5
SusWrite 135
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 88%
External USB3.0 1TB
819GB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 33 33 34 34 33 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
25.9% Poor
Read 57.2
Write 30.2
Mixed 24.2
SusWrite 32.8
26% 36.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
104% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 20GB
null MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
42.8% Average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 13.2
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 15.3
SC Mixed 14.6
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 64.6
62% 64.6 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 57 60 23.8" 1920 1017 LEN66BD L24i-30
Typical GA-Z68X-UD3-B3 Builds (Compare 211 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z68X-UD3-B3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $463
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback