Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics118% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive167% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING  (all builds)
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20240322
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 03 '24 at 12:49
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
85.2% Excellent
Memory 66.8
1-Core 140
2-Core 277
85% 161 Pts
4-Core 554
8-Core 950
91% 752 Pts
64-Core 1425
88% 1425 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
118% Outstanding
Lighting 158
Reflection 175
Parallax 164
129% 166 fps
MRender 126
Gravity 166
Splatting 116
110% 136 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 118%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte GP-ASM2NE2512GTTDR 512GB
229GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM22.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 751 370 366 233 382 378 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
167% Outstanding
Read 1,300
Write 1,928
Mixed 1457
SusWrite 413
288% 1,274 MB/s
4K Read 44.8
4K Write 134
4K Mixed 48
200% 75.7 MB/s
DQ Read 516
DQ Write 785
DQ Mixed 1,006
662% 769 MB/s
Poor: 129%
This bench: 167%
Great: 290%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$48
263GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 206 189 204 199 202 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
99.3% Outstanding
Read 146
Write 175
Mixed 80.9
SusWrite 200
110% 151 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
215% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 99.3%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown GD2.1842CS.004 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
65.6% Good
MC Read 26.5
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 25.7
67% 23.4 GB/s
SC Read 20.3
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 25
60% 21 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 58 60 24" 1280 720 AOC2460 2460G5
Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 4,674 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $138

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $656
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback