Asus H81M-A/BR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics196% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive46.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H81M-A/BR  (all builds)
Memory2.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141020
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateMay 03 '24 at 12:32
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4440-$128
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
69.1% Good
Memory 88.3
1-Core 82.9
2-Core 162
67% 111 Pts
4-Core 291
8-Core 290
39% 290 Pts
64-Core 288
18% 288 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-S (Super)-$600
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
196% Outstanding
Lighting 249
Reflection 403
Parallax 345
203% 332 fps
MRender 468
Gravity 274
Splatting 221
251% 321 fps
Poor: 173%
This bench: 196%
Great: 235%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA400S37960G 960GB
673GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKZ1.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 276 304 414 428 443 440 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
46.8% Average
Read 142
Write 64.9
Mixed 32.3
SusWrite 384
35% 156 MB/s
4K Read 14
4K Write 14.6
4K Mixed 10.1
42% 12.9 MB/s
DQ Read 12.6
DQ Write 216
DQ Mixed 184
122% 137 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 102%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
371GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 129 128 130 128 128 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
72% Very good
Read 123
Write 125
Mixed 61.2
SusWrite 128
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
134% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 72%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
30.7% Below average
MC Read 10
MC Write 10.1
MC Mixed 8.9
28% 9.67 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 10
SC Mixed 9.2
27% 9.5 GB/s
Latency 67.7
59% 67.7 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 30.7%
Great: 35%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 57 60 20" 1280 720 GSF2000 LED
Typical H81M-A/BR Builds (Compare 438 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-A/BR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $156
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback