Intel X99

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics93.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive95.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardIntel X99  (all builds)
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20231030
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 03 '24 at 08:25
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2695 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
62.9% Good
Memory 68
1-Core 78.4
2-Core 164
59% 103 Pts
4-Core 311
8-Core 610
54% 460 Pts
64-Core 1,439
89% 1,439 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$250
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 24.4.1
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
93.8% Outstanding
Lighting 117
Reflection 192
Parallax 192
95% 167 fps
MRender 113
Gravity 133
Splatting 94.2
91% 113 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 93.8%
Great: 104%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN256HAJQ-000L2 256GB
142GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MVT04L0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 381 306 311 288 303 299 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
95.3% Outstanding
Read 454
Write 434
Mixed 394
SusWrite 315
90% 399 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 65.3
4K Mixed 42.6
134% 45.8 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 348
262% 352 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 95.3%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KF3200C16D4/8GX 2x8GB
2 of 24 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
59.3% Above average
MC Read 27.2
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 19.3
63% 22.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 15.1
39% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 64: 0P 5R 10G 9B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
64% 49% 49 472 378 144 24" 1920 1017 GSM5C00 LG ULTRAGEAR
Typical X99 Builds (Compare 2,351 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Intel X99

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $130
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback