Lenovo 81UJ

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics92.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 81UJ  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory23.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit kolorów, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190412
Uptime18.3 Days
Run DateMay 03 '24 at 05:19
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
74.7% Very good
Memory 81
1-Core 119
2-Core 214
78% 138 Pts
4-Core 369
8-Core 565
58% 467 Pts
64-Core 640
40% 640 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 87%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080 (Mobile Max-Q)
Legend(17AA 3FEE) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.86
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
92.5% Outstanding
Lighting 114
Reflection 140
Parallax 125
93% 126 fps
MRender 149
Gravity 103
Splatting 93.9
92% 115 fps
Poor: 73%
This bench: 92.5%
Great: 102%
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Legend(17AA 3FEE) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2127
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
5.36% Terrible
Lighting 5.6
Reflection 7.9
Parallax 7.3
5% 6.93 fps
MRender 8.7
Gravity 6
Splatting 10
7% 8.23 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.36%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
809GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5L1QEXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,436
Write 1,355
Mixed 1,161
294% 1,317 MB/s
4K Read 40.3
4K Write 59.4
4K Mixed 47.1
153% 48.9 MB/s
DQ Read 604
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 473
353% 475 MB/s
Poor: 145% Great: 329%
WDC WDS200T1R0A-68A4W0 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 411000WR
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 452
Write 405
Mixed 317
87% 391 MB/s
4K Read 27.2
4K Write 50.8
4K Mixed 32.7
110% 36.9 MB/s
DQ Read 342
DQ Write 278
DQ Mixed 240
199% 287 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 122%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA82GS6JJR8N-VK 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
78% Very good
MC Read 29.2
MC Write 30.2
MC Mixed 24.5
80% 28 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 31.5
SC Mixed 23.7
68% 23.9 GB/s
Latency 82.9
48% 82.9 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 78%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 65" 1280 720 PHL04C3 Philips FTV
Typical 81UJ Builds (Compare 536 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht

System: Lenovo 81UJ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback