Lenovo 83C0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics77.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive150% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemLenovo 83C0  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory23.9 GB free of 32 GB
Display3200 x 2000 - 32 Bit colors, 3200 x 2000 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230817
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateMay 03 '24 at 05:15
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
13th Gen Intel Core i9-13905H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
58.5% Above average
Memory 44.6
1-Core 120
2-Core 204
65% 123 Pts
4-Core 387
8-Core 720
66% 554 Pts
64-Core 1,513
94% 1,513 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4050 (Laptop)
Legend(17AA 3FA0) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3227
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
77.9% Very good
Lighting 90
Reflection 161
Parallax 112
73% 121 fps
MRender 154
Gravity 94.3
Splatting 81.9
87% 110 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 113%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL21T0HCLR-00BL2 1TB
819GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CL1QGXA7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 958 1234 1198 1276 1301 1280 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
150% Outstanding
Read 627
Write 602
Mixed 770
SusWrite 1,208
182% 802 MB/s
4K Read 29.9
4K Write 33.5
4K Mixed 30.9
103% 31.4 MB/s
DQ Read 761
DQ Write 98.5
DQ Mixed 217
213% 359 MB/s
Poor: 201%
This bench: 150%
Great: 458%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MT62F2G32D4DS-026 WT 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB Row of chips 23h clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
160% Outstanding
MC Read 57.9
MC Write 75.3
MC Mixed 63.2
187% 65.5 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 27.8
SC Mixed 22.7
61% 21.5 GB/s
Latency 142
28% 142 ns
Poor: 125%
This bench: 160%
Great: 174%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 5: 0P 0R 1G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
5% 3% 92 213 58 165 16" 1280 720 LEN8BA2
Typical 83C0 Builds (Compare 129 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

System: Lenovo 83C0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback