MSI MS-1582

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive241% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star Katana GF66 11UD
MotherboardMSI MS-1582  (all builds)
Memory25.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230706
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 03 '24 at 00:52
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11800H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
66.6% Good
Memory 73.6
1-Core 134
2-Core 245
83% 151 Pts
4-Core 331
8-Core 414
48% 372 Pts
64-Core 486
30% 486 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
MSI(1462 12EC) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.2079
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
4.54% Terrible
Lighting 6.9
Reflection 13.2
Parallax 9
6% 9.7 fps
MRender 1
Gravity 8.6
Splatting 0.2
2% 3.27 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.54%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT2000P3PSSD8 2TB
513GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P9CR40A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 575 88 88 330 90 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
241% Outstanding
Read 2,048
Write 4,044
Mixed 2,503
SusWrite 209
498% 2,201 MB/s
4K Read 61.3
4K Write 256
4K Mixed 96.9
352% 138 MB/s
DQ Read 1,029
DQ Write 651
DQ Mixed 167
306% 616 MB/s
Poor: 133%
This bench: 241%
Great: 517%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT32G4SFD832A.C16FF 1x31GB
1 of 2 slots used
31GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
47.4% Average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 14.2
46% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 15.1
45% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 93.5
43% 93.5 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 144 27" 1280 720 ACR074B EG270
Typical MS-1582 Builds (Compare 3,934 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI MS-1582

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback