Gigabyte GA-B650 GAMING X AX V2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 120%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics240% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B650 GAMING X AX V2  (all builds)
Memory55.3 GB free of 64 GB
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240422
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 02 '24 at 23:30
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D-$310
AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Memory 93
1-Core 199
2-Core 395
121% 229 Pts
4-Core 783
8-Core 1,490
135% 1,136 Pts
64-Core 1,809
112% 1,809 Pts
Poor: 105%
This bench: 120%
Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 7900-XT-$900
Sapphire(1DA2 471E) ≥ 4GB
Driver: amdxn64.dll Ver. 31.0.24031.5001
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
240% Outstanding
Lighting 308
Reflection 442
Parallax 651
251% 467 fps
MRender 465
Gravity 240
Splatting 446
319% 384 fps
Poor: 158%
This bench: 240%
Great: 249%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS2241 2TB SSD
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS224C10
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,497
Write 231
Mixed 139
132% 622 MB/s
4K Read 40.7
4K Write 93.6
4K Mixed 17
133% 50.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,606
DQ Write 790
DQ Mixed 1,435
1,002% 1,277 MB/s
Poor: 158% Great: 542%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown UD5-5200 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
184% Outstanding
MC Read 75.6
MC Write 59.6
MC Mixed 66.2
192% 67.1 GB/s
SC Read 53.4
SC Write 65
SC Mixed 57.4
167% 58.6 GB/s
Latency 58.7
68% 58.7 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 184%
Great: 196%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 60 34" 1280 720 ACR0B00 ED343CUR V
Typical GA-B650 GAMING X AX V2 Builds (Compare 141 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 244%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 248%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B650 GAMING X AX V2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 115% - Outstanding Total price: $1,054
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback