Samsung RF511/RF411/RF711

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive57% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemSamsung RF511/RF411/RF711  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG RF511/RF411/RF711
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121127
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 02 '24 at 22:26
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2630QM-$230
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Memory 93.5
1-Core 67.3
2-Core 70.9
54% 77.2 Pts
4-Core 161
8-Core 102
19% 131 Pts
64-Core 222
14% 222 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C0A5) 2GB
Driver: nvumdshimx.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 1% Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TB
134GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 401000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 372 387 136 13 15 6.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
57% Above average
Read 417
Write 397
Mixed 339
SusWrite 155
73% 327 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 33.9
4K Mixed 23.4
77% 25.6 MB/s
DQ Read 186
DQ Write 114
DQ Mixed 163
118% 154 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 57%
Great: 117%
WD Black 2.5" 750GB (2011)-$87
30GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 89 91 88 91 91 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
51.9% Above average
Read 90.1
Write 78.6
Mixed 65.7
SusWrite 90.4
60% 81.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KNWMX1-ETB 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43.9% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 14.2
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 11.4
31% 11 GB/s
Latency 116
35% 116 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 38 31 60 17.2" 1600 900 SEC334D
Typical RF511/RF411/RF711 Builds (Compare 301 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung RF511/RF411/RF711

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $258
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback