Lenovo 10MCS03U00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.17% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive79.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 10MCS03U00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 36C7
Memory4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180702
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 02 '24 at 22:08
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD PRO A8-9600 R7, 10 COMPUTE CORES 4C+6G
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
48.2% Average
Memory 63.2
1-Core 62.5
2-Core 124
49% 83.3 Pts
4-Core 193
8-Core 193
26% 193 Pts
64-Core 192
12% 192 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
Legend(17AA 36C7) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.10.02
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
6.17% Terrible
Lighting 7.7
Reflection 8.2
Parallax 11.3
6% 9.07 fps
MRender 4.6
Gravity 9.1
Splatting 7.8
6% 7.17 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.17%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN256HCHP-000L7 256GB
183GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03L6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 266 229 226 227 254 266 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
79.9% Very good
Read 429
Write 296
Mixed 250
SusWrite 245
68% 305 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 57.5
4K Mixed 31.7
114% 39.2 MB/s
DQ Read 323
DQ Write 244
DQ Mixed 219
181% 262 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 101%
Seagate ST4000NM0033-9ZM170 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: SN04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 178 174 176 179 181 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 184
Write 183
Mixed 92.6
SusWrite 177
116% 159 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1
223% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 104%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-2G6H1 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.8% Poor
MC Read 10
MC Write 7.3
MC Mixed 8.4
24% 8.57 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 6.8
16% 5.8 GB/s
Latency 171
23% 171 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 23.8%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 43 10 60 12.6" 1280 720 ITE6516 DP2VGA V226
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback