Gigabyte GA-H410M H V3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive31.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
29 days ago, 29 days ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H410M H V3  (all builds)
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210830
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 02 '24 at 21:55
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400F-$98
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Memory 86.5
1-Core 121
2-Core 236
83% 148 Pts
4-Core 432
8-Core 731
71% 582 Pts
64-Core 914
56% 914 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
Nvidia(10DE 1536) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
101% Outstanding
Lighting 133
Reflection 118
Parallax 124
109% 125 fps
MRender 142
Gravity 100
Splatting 87.9
87% 110 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 101%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer AS340 480GB
95GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AP613PE0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 291 114 112 113 58 117 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
31.5% Below average
Read 196
Write 105
Mixed 87
SusWrite 134
29% 131 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 17.7
4K Mixed 10.8
50% 15.3 MB/s
DQ Read 14.4
DQ Write 15.3
DQ Mixed 14.6
11% 14.8 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 106%
Seagate BarraCuda Q5 ZP1000CV30001 1TB
148GB free
Firmware: SU5SS002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1207 1367 36 36 223 38 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
133% Outstanding
Read 1,030
Write 1,730
Mixed 1,199
SusWrite 485
251% 1,111 MB/s
4K Read 38
4K Write 50.6
4K Mixed 42.7
139% 43.8 MB/s
DQ Read 721
DQ Write 131
DQ Mixed 256
231% 369 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 133%
Great: 270%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$40
47GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 125 130 129 127 124 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
72.8% Very good
Read 128
Write 119
Mixed 18
SusWrite 126
70% 97.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
152% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Apacer D12.2328LS.001 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
35.6% Below average
MC Read 13.6
MC Write 10.7
MC Mixed 10.4
33% 11.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 10.7
SC Mixed 12
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 70.9
56% 70.9 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 31.5" 1280 720 GSM7750 LG HDR 4K
Typical GA-H410M H V3 Builds (Compare 4,730 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H410M H V3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $126
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback