Asrock H310CM-HDV

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics45.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsrock H310CM-HDV  (all builds)
Memory3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190514
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateMay 02 '24 at 19:50
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-9100F-$115
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Memory 84.9
1-Core 122
2-Core 241
83% 149 Pts
4-Core 439
8-Core 443
59% 441 Pts
64-Core 444
28% 444 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
45.7% Average
Lighting 57.2
Reflection 54
Parallax 53.9
47% 55 fps
MRender 64.7
Gravity 51.7
Splatting 48
44% 54.8 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Neo Forza NFS011SA356-6007000 256GB
189GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0707B0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 472
Write 368
Mixed 120
70% 320 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 73.2
4K Mixed 1.3
84% 34.4 MB/s
DQ Read 167
DQ Write 294
DQ Mixed 1.8
66% 154 MB/s
Poor: 36% Great: 92%
WDC WDBNCE5000PNC 500GB
465GB free
Firmware: 415000RL
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 411
Write 413
Mixed 353
88% 392 MB/s
4K Read 33.4
4K Write 73
4K Mixed 41.2
142% 49.2 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 313
DQ Mixed 254
216% 318 MB/s
Poor: 69% Great: 115%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown NMUD480E84-2666E 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.3% Below average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 12.9
MC Mixed 11.5
37% 13 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 13.4
SC Mixed 12.2
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 76.2
52% 76.2 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 47 22 60 26" 1920 1009 VIZ0067 E261VA
Typical H310CM-HDV Builds (Compare 3,883 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock H310CM-HDV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $268
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback