Asus ROG STRIX Z490-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics25.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive249% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z490-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211027
Uptime6.9 Days
Run DateMay 02 '24 at 19:45
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700KF
, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 95.3
1-Core 147
2-Core 288
98% 177 Pts
4-Core 582
8-Core 1,045
98% 814 Pts
64-Core 1,539
95% 1,539 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 102%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 552.12
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.9% Poor
Lighting 32.5
Reflection 34.3
Parallax 32.5
26% 33.1 fps
MRender 38.3
Gravity 32.6
Splatting 23
25% 31.3 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Samsung SSD 980 1TB
237GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1463 1092 1045 1023 994 970 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
249% Outstanding
Read 2,090
Write 1,793
Mixed 1157
SusWrite 1,098
343% 1,534 MB/s
4K Read 41.6
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 57.1
194% 69.5 MB/s
DQ Read 953
DQ Write 758
DQ Mixed 845
635% 852 MB/s
Poor: 134%
This bench: 249%
Great: 421%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
324GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 135 134 134 135 133 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Read 153
Write 149
Mixed 78.7
SusWrite 134
94% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
128% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GB-$65
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
60.8% Good
MC Read 22.8
MC Write 21.4
MC Mixed 16.5
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 23.4
SC Mixed 21.1
58% 20.3 GB/s
Latency 54
74% 54 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 32: 0P 3R 4G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
32% 21% 58 215 57 60 21.7" 1280 720 GSM5ABB LG FULL HD
Typical ROG STRIX Z490-E GAMING Builds (Compare 10,432 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 178%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 177%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z490-E GAMING - $350

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $1,497
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback