Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics54% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180111
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateMay 02 '24 at 18:46
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User IRL-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8600K-$125
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
92.3% Outstanding
Memory 91.5
1-Core 127
2-Core 249
88% 156 Pts
4-Core 504
8-Core 707
76% 606 Pts
64-Core 720
45% 720 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 92.3%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Asus(1043 8618) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
54% Above average
Lighting 66.8
Reflection 70
Parallax 65.5
54% 67.4 fps
MRender 63.9
Gravity 67.9
Splatting 63.5
53% 65.1 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 54%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 147 29 65 9.8 24 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
72.6% Very good
Read 466
Write 212
Mixed 324
SusWrite 52.2
58% 263 MB/s
4K Read 34.6
4K Write 73.6
4K Mixed 36.5
138% 48.2 MB/s
DQ Read 265
DQ Write 110
DQ Mixed 16.7
58% 131 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 100%
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$99
37GB free
Firmware: P2CR033 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,088
Write 1694
Mixed 1,169
297% 1,317 MB/s
4K Read 44.9
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 64.9
214% 76.4 MB/s
DQ Read 723
DQ Write 848
DQ Mixed 882
638% 818 MB/s
Poor: 84% Great: 299%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
242GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 129 130 127 129 127 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Read 180
Write 152
Mixed 103
SusWrite 128
104% 141 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.2
247% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 109%
Samsung M3 Portable 1TB
314GB free
Firmware: 1306
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 74 74 70 74 75 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
41.3% Average
Read 71.9
Write 49.6
Mixed 46.9
SusWrite 72.1
44% 60.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
110% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM4X8GD3000C15K4 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.2% Good
MC Read 27.4
MC Write 25.3
MC Mixed 21.4
71% 24.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 17.2
48% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 64.5
62% 64.5 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 57 144 24" 1280 720 ACI24E1 VG248
Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,369 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $642
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback