Gigabyte GA-B650M GAMING X AX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 113%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 97%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics88.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive587% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B650M GAMING X AX  (all builds)
Memory26.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231108
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 02 '24 at 18:42
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X-$197
AM5, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 5.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Memory 79.6
1-Core 212
2-Core 408
121% 233 Pts
4-Core 698
8-Core 1,206
115% 952 Pts
64-Core 1,412
87% 1,412 Pts
Poor: 101%
This bench: 105%
Great: 120%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6600-$330
Sapphire(1DA2 E451) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.20.44
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
88.7% Excellent
Lighting 89
Reflection 136
Parallax 164
72% 129 fps
MRender 188
Gravity 91.6
Splatting 159
120% 146 fps
Poor: 79%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 93%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
XPG GAMMIX S70 BLADE 1TB
766GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.2.J.F0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4850 4957 4891 4902 4903 4920 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
587% Outstanding
Read 2,402
Write 4,240
Mixed 2,682
SusWrite 4,904
810% 3,557 MB/s
4K Read 69.4
4K Write 252
4K Mixed 105
373% 142 MB/s
DQ Read 1923
DQ Write 1,554
DQ Mixed 1,738
1,301% 1,738 MB/s
Poor: 276%
This bench: 587%
Great: 606%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AX5U6000C3016G-BLABB 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
146% Outstanding
MC Read 51.5
MC Write 53.4
MC Mixed 51.4
149% 52.1 GB/s
SC Read 47.9
SC Write 57.8
SC Mixed 50.8
149% 52.2 GB/s
Latency 80.4
50% 80.4 ns
Poor: 145%
This bench: 146%
Great: 202%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 12: 0P 1R 1G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
12% 6% 97 215 57 165 27" 1280 720 AUS2703 ASUS VG279Q1A
Typical GA-B650M GAMING X AX Builds (Compare 73 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 257%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 114%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 247%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B650M GAMING X AX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $1,067
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback