Gigabyte GA-Z97X-Gaming 3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics57.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z97X-Gaming 3  (all builds)
Memory26.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150918
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateMay 02 '24 at 18:04
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690K-$50
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
76.3% Very good
Memory 88.3
1-Core 106
2-Core 205
77% 133 Pts
4-Core 372
8-Core 374
50% 373 Pts
64-Core 372
23% 372 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 11D7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 551.86
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
57.7% Above average
Lighting 71.6
Reflection 75.9
Parallax 68.9
58% 72.1 fps
MRender 66.4
Gravity 72.4
Splatting 67.7
56% 68.8 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nx-512 2280 512GB
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.1.A.1S
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 606
Write 529
Mixed 446
117% 527 MB/s
4K Read 36.1
4K Write 67.7
4K Mixed 36.9
138% 46.9 MB/s
DQ Read 700
DQ Write 439
DQ Mixed 180
239% 439 MB/s
Poor: 131% Great: 293%
Seagate ST1000VM002-1CT162 1TB
102GB free
Firmware: SC11
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 103
Write 110
Mixed 54.3
66% 89 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
133% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 42% Great: 98%
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44
76GB free
Firmware: 1AC01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 77 76 75 76 80 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
47.4% Average
Read 86.9
Write 95.4
Mixed 60.1
SusWrite 77.7
59% 80 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
183% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 62%
Generic MassStorageClass 125GB
86GB free, PID 0749
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 91.7
Write 87.2
Mixed 83.1
112% 87.3 MB/s
4K Read 9.8
4K Write 6.2
4K Mixed 5.8
444% 7.27 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 44%
Samsung M3 Portable 1TB
188GB free, PID 61b6
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 41 42 43 42 42 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
20.8% Poor
Read 55.2
Write 35.2
Mixed 33.2
SusWrite 41.1
53% 41.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
71% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 20.8%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G KHX1600C10D3/8G KHX1600C10D3/8G KHX1866C10D3/8G 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
61.4% Good
MC Read 21.8
MC Write 23
MC Mixed 19.2
61% 21.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 20.7
SC Mixed 19.7
54% 18.9 GB/s
Latency 69.4
58% 69.4 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 55 26 60 28.8" 2560 1017 GSM59F1 LG ULTRAWIDE
Typical GA-Z97X-Gaming 3 Builds (Compare 3,155 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z97X-Gaming 3 - $169

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $817
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback