Asus Z170-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics3.28% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus Z170-A  (all builds)
Memory1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180315
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 02 '24 at 17:47
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
91.6% Outstanding
Memory 92.1
1-Core 124
2-Core 250
87% 155 Pts
4-Core 495
8-Core 683
74% 589 Pts
64-Core 685
42% 685 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
MSI(1462 8C93) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
3.28% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 3.9
Parallax 4.2
3% 4 fps
MRender 4
Gravity 3.8
Splatting 4.7
3% 4.17 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.28%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 256GB
140GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HCS1A25E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 380 376 216 95 45 130 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
70.6% Very good
Read 466
Write 387
Mixed 359
SusWrite 207
80% 355 MB/s
4K Read 38.5
4K Write 62.4
4K Mixed 10.7
105% 37.2 MB/s
DQ Read 176
DQ Write 264
DQ Mixed 17.5
70% 152 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 108%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 32GB
29GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
8.7% Terrible
Read 27.9
Write 0.2
Mixed 0.2
SusWrite 12.7
10% 10.2 MB/s
4K Read 8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
30% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 8.7%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A5143EB1-CPB 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2187 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
40% Average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 13.5
MC Mixed 10.5
37% 13 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 13.6
SC Mixed 12.4
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 65.4
61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 40%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 22 1 30 84.6" 2194 1234 SAM735A SAMSUNG
Typical Z170-A Builds (Compare 8,823 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Z170-A - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $796
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback