Gigabyte GA-X99P-SLI-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 116%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics155% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive36.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory40GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 40GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte Default string
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X99P-SLI-CF  (all builds)
Memory35.6 GB free of 40 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180313
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 02 '24 at 17:14
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6800K-$103
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Memory 88
1-Core 109
2-Core 221
79% 140 Pts
4-Core 424
8-Core 697
68% 561 Pts
64-Core 866
54% 866 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6900-XT-$1,000
AMD(1002 0E3A) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 24.4.1
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
155% Outstanding
Lighting 202
Reflection 234
Parallax 412
165% 283 fps
MRender 346
Gravity 0.3
Splatting 280
175% 209 fps
Poor: 177%
This bench: 155%
Great: 209%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel X25-M 80GB
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2CV102HA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 67 54 54 52 54 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
36.1% Below average
Read 228
Write 79.2
Mixed 113
SusWrite 57
26% 119 MB/s
4K Read 15.9
4K Write 51
4K Mixed 9.7
64% 25.5 MB/s
DQ Read 151
DQ Write 80.4
DQ Mixed 80.8
69% 104 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 9965684-013.A00G F4-3200C16-16GFX F4-3200C16-16GFX 40GB
2666, 2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
92.2% Outstanding
MC Read 37.5
MC Write 37.5
MC Mixed 30.8
101% 35.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 19.4
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 68.6
58% 68.6 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 6: 0P 0R 0G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
6% 50% 12 191 56 60 24" 1280 720 IVM6119 PLG2488H
Typical GA-X99P-SLI-CF Builds (Compare 319 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X99P-SLI-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $471
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback