To Intel X79

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics8.49% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardTo Intel X79  (all builds)
Memory25.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200330
Uptime11.8 Days
Run DateMay 02 '24 at 16:14
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User IRL-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2651 v2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
54.8% Above average
Memory 70.9
1-Core 46.8
2-Core 106
46% 74.4 Pts
4-Core 210
8-Core 421
37% 315 Pts
64-Core 811
50% 811 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P400
Nvidia(10DE 11BE) 2GB
CLim: 1252 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 536.25
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
8.49% Terrible
Lighting 10.2
Reflection 12.6
Parallax 9.2
8% 10.7 fps
MRender 10.2
Gravity 9.7
Splatting 12
9% 10.6 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.49%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDPEKNW512G8H 512GB
276GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 304 55 125 59 57 57 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 1,239
Write 892
Mixed 822
SusWrite 109
170% 766 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 47
4K Mixed 33.5
109% 35.8 MB/s
DQ Read 308
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 220
171% 239 MB/s
Poor: 88%
This bench: 101%
Great: 203%
Intel SSDMCEAW120A4 120GB
2GB free
Firmware: DC33
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 394
Write 125
Mixed 143
48% 221 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 46.5
4K Mixed 26.9
95% 32.3 MB/s
DQ Read 199
DQ Write 113
DQ Mixed 110
94% 140 MB/s
Poor: 44% Great: 74%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
488GB free
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 68 70 69 68 68 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
36.7% Below average
Read 59.6
Write 57.1
Mixed 40.5
SusWrite 68.3
42% 56.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.4
82% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 36KSF2G72PZ-1 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
47.5% Average
MC Read 22.1
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 17.8
52% 18.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 7
21% 7.5 GB/s
Latency 98.1
41% 98.1 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 59 60 31.5" 1280 720 AOC3202 Q32E2WG5B
Typical Intel X79 Builds (Compare 1,987 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat

Motherboard: To Intel X79

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $158
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $252Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback