| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 44.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| System | HP Z440 Workstation (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 212B |
| Memory | 12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20200612 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | May 02 '24 at 14:41 |
| Run Duration | 120 Seconds |
| Run User | ITA-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
|
75.8%
Very good
|
79% 140 Pts
|
58% 474 Pts
|
36% 582 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia Quadro P2200
Nvidia(10DE 131B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1746 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 5GB, Driver: 537.70
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
44.2%
Average
|
40% 57.3 fps
|
51% 62.8 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung MZHPU256HCGL-000H1 256GB
124GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UXM62H1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 561 621 591 609 633 689 MB/s
|
||||
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M393A1G40EB1-CRC 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
64.8%
Good
|
68% 23.7 GB/s
|
45% 15.8 GB/s
|
51% 78 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
| Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0% | 0% | 0 | 1442 | 841 | 60 | 23.8" | 1280 720 | PHL0944 PHL 242S1 |
Typical Z440 Workstation Builds (Compare 6,038 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP Z440 Workstation
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Xeon E5-1620 v3IntelBench 72%, 10,197 samples | 1,255x |
| Xeon E5-1650 v4IntelBench 83%, 3,842 samples | 1,046x |
| Xeon E5-1650 v3IntelBench 77%, 7,962 samples | 871x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples | 746x |
| Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples | 378x |
| Quadro K4200Nvidia $820Bench 21%, 7,330 samples | 223x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 9% - Terrible | Total price: $440 |