MSI MAG Z790 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7D91)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 270%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 124%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 320%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (95th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 5 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 128%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics218% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive512% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D91
MotherboardMSI MAG Z790 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7D91)  (all builds)
Memory27.4 GB free of 32 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240326
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 02 '24 at 13:53
Run Duration270 Seconds
Run User SAU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-12900K-$264
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
128% Outstanding
Memory 95
1-Core 215
2-Core 430
129% 246 Pts
4-Core 857
8-Core 1713
152% 1,285 Pts
64-Core 3,054
189% 3,054 Pts
Poor: 107%
This bench: 128%
Great: 124%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 770
MSI(1462 7D91) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4255
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
9.07% Terrible
Lighting 10.4
Reflection 16
Parallax 12.1
8% 12.8 fps
MRender 13.9
Gravity 13
Splatting 11.2
10% 12.7 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.07%
Great: 9%
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$580
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 552.12
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
218% Outstanding
Lighting 326
Reflection 294
Parallax 329
266% 316 fps
MRender 351
Gravity 261
Splatting 191
210% 268 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 218%
Great: 225%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$107
806GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3533 3538 3532 2117 1633 1619 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
512% Outstanding
Read 2,970
Write 3,568
Mixed 3,238
SusWrite 2,662
703% 3,109 MB/s
4K Read 92.8
4K Write 293
4K Mixed 138
473% 175 MB/s
DQ Read 2,123
DQ Write 1,679
DQ Mixed 1,906
1,425% 1,903 MB/s
Poor: 274%
This bench: 512%
Great: 488%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 994GB
560GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 924 929 936 936 875 580 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 34% Great: 116%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$107
633GB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3276 3274 3275 2278 1538 1546 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
497% Outstanding
Read 2,848
Write 2,748
Mixed 3,045
SusWrite 2,531
630% 2793 MB/s
4K Read 82.4
4K Write 266
4K Mixed 124
425% 158 MB/s
DQ Read 2,305
DQ Write 2,058
DQ Mixed 2,169
1,630% 2,177 MB/s
Poor: 274%
This bench: 497%
Great: 488%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F5-5600J2834F162x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
214% Outstanding
MC Read 85.8
MC Write 85.3
MC Mixed 81.2
240% 84.1 GB/s
SC Read 31.1
SC Write 51.4
SC Mixed 42.6
119% 41.7 GB/s
Latency 59
68% 59 ns
Poor: 136%
This bench: 214%
Great: 204%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 54 500 23.9" 1280 720 SAM707D LF24T35
Typical MAG Z790 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7D91) Builds (Compare 5,516 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 442%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 123%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 528%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG Z790 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7D91)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $2,231
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback