bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics9.63% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 4GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
SystemVMware, VMware20,1
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory0.5 GB free of 4.00391 GB @ 0 GHz
Display4096 x 2304 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230522
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 02 '24 at 11:30
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700K
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 41.5
2-Core 191
47% 116 Pts
4-Core 232
8-Core 275
33% 253 Pts
64-Core 280
17% 280 Pts
Poor: 59% Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Vmware SVGA 3D
Vmware(15AD 0405) ≥ 4GB
Driver: vm3dum64_loader.dll Ver. 9.17.6.5
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
9.63% Terrible
Lighting 0.8
Reflection 0.5
Parallax 47
1% 16.1 fps
MRender 34.2
Gravity 25.1
Splatting 38
27% 32.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 9.63%
Great: 69%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual NVMe Disk 64GB
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,843
Write 1,566
Mixed 1,900
395% 1770 MB/s
4K Read 31.4
4K Write 36
4K Mixed 37.9
115% 35.1 MB/s
DQ Read 211
DQ Write 168
DQ Mixed 176
135% 185 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 103%
Samsung PSSD T7 1TB
912GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 127 109 183 246 202 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
30.1% Below average
Read 219
Write 239
Mixed 225
SusWrite 167
48% 212 MB/s
4K Read 9.5
4K Write 10.2
4K Mixed 9.7
32% 9.8 MB/s
DQ Read 24.3
DQ Write 24.8
DQ Mixed 24
18% 24.4 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
VMware Virtual RAM VMW-4096MB Virtual RAM VMW-4MB 4GB
0, 0 MHz
4096, 4 MB
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
52.1% Above average
MC Read 19.5
MC Write 25.6
MC Mixed 18.9
61% 21.3 GB/s
SC Read 4.9
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 1.5
11% 3.9 GB/s
Latency 134
30% 134 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 12: 0P 0R 2G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
12% 26% 31 185 15 60 0" 1280 720 Default
Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,455 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback