Acer Aspire A715-76G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics8.69% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Aspire A715-76G  (all builds)
MotherboardADL Metis_ADP
Memory19.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230204
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateMay 02 '24 at 09:24
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12450H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
96.1% Outstanding
Memory 68.3
1-Core 172
2-Core 336
100% 192 Pts
4-Core 666
8-Core 940
101% 803 Pts
64-Core 1,195
74% 1,195 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 96.1%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Acer(1025 1608) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 30.0.101.1298
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
8.69% Terrible
Lighting 8.2
Reflection 14.9
Parallax 9.8
7% 11 fps
MRender 16.9
Gravity 16
Splatting 13.9
13% 15.6 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.69%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-512G-1014 512GB
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 73101100 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,913
Write 3,088
Mixed 1,852
652% 2,951 MB/s
4K Read 70
4K Write 267
4K Mixed 83.8
355% 140 MB/s
DQ Read 1,495
DQ Write 757
DQ Mixed 769
666% 1007 MB/s
Poor: 217% Great: 480%
Nvme KINGSTON SKC3000S1024G 1TB
279GB free
Firmware: EIFK31.6 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2410 1437 1313 1194 1289 1160 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
358% Outstanding
Read 1,818
Write 2,260
Mixed 2024
SusWrite 1,467
428% 1,892 MB/s
4K Read 58.7
4K Write 271
4K Mixed 112
376% 147 MB/s
DQ Read 1,953
DQ Write 1572
DQ Mixed 1,712
1,295% 1,746 MB/s
Poor: 205%
This bench: 358%
Great: 609%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4SFRA32A.M16FR 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
100% Outstanding
MC Read 37.4
MC Write 37.8
MC Mixed 36
106% 37.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.8
SC Write 40.6
SC Mixed 26.8
81% 28.4 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 100%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 39: 0P 5R 4G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
39% 11% 99 96 56 60 15.5" 1280 720 BOE0A56
Typical Aspire A715-76G Builds (Compare 262 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Acer Aspire A715-76G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback