TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 81SY

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics44.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive120% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 81SY  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory7.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220524
Uptime4.6 Days
Run DateMay 02 '24 at 04:24
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
77.7% Very good
Memory 84.8
1-Core 101
2-Core 203
74% 129 Pts
4-Core 381
8-Core 626
62% 503 Pts
64-Core 800
50% 800 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑
This bench: 77.7%
 Great: 87%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Legend(17AA 3FFB) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8729
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
6.12% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 9.6
Parallax 8.3
5% 7.97 fps
MRender 9.9
Gravity 7.1
Splatting 13.1
8% 10 fps
Poor: 4% ↑
This bench: 6.12%
 Great: 6%
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile)
Legend(17AA 3FFB) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
44.6% Average
Lighting 57.7
Reflection 64.1
Parallax 52.8
47% 58.2 fps
MRender 42.5
Gravity 52.2
Splatting 50.2
40% 48.3 fps
Poor: 28% ↑
This bench: 44.6%
 Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-256G-1101 256GB
127GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11110001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 388 319 301 312 301 314 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 818
Write 982
Mixed 792
SusWrite 322
164% 729 MB/s
4K Read 33.9
4K Write 65.8
4K Mixed 43.5
142% 47.7 MB/s
DQ Read 630
DQ Write 422
DQ Mixed 538
398% 530 MB/s
Poor: 108% ↑
This bench: 120%
 Great: 216%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB
809GB free
Firmware: LXM4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 171 170 168 166 164 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
82% Excellent
Read 118
Write 173
Mixed 69.6
SusWrite 168
96% 132 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.4
111% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑
This bench: 82%
 Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G6J1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
77.6% Very good
MC Read 30.2
MC Write 30.9
MC Mixed 22.6
80% 27.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 32.7
SC Mixed 19.5
64% 22.4 GB/s
Latency 74.6
54% 74.6 ns
Poor: 56% ↑
This bench: 77.6%
 Great: 87%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 55 60 15.5" 1280 720 AUO21ED
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical 81SY Builds (Compare 2,276 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 81SY

CPU
Core i5-9300HIntelBench 65%, 116,682 samples950x
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples898x
Core i5-9300HFIntelBench 73%, 6,965 samples300x
GPU
GTX 1650 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 41%, 92,838 samples2,053x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples222x
GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q DesignNvidiaBench 45%, 1 sample1x
SSD
MTFDHBA256TCK 256GBMicronBench 154%, 946 samples167x
PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G-1101 512GBWDCBench 218%, 6,277 samples149x
MZVLB256HBHQ-000L2 256GBSamsungBench 198%, 9,460 samples135x
RAM
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 54,121 samples349x
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 43,895 samples273x
RMSA3260ME78HAF-2666 1x8GBRamaxelBench 39%, 16,227 samples247x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback