Asus VivoBook_ASUS Laptop X505ZA_X505ZA

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 46% Yacht	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	5.83% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	36.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUS Laptop X505ZA_X505ZA (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X505ZA
Memory	1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200225
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 02 '24 at 04:00
Run Duration	146 Seconds
Run User	IND-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U 61,910 User benchmarks, average bench 49% FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.75 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	43.7% Average	Memory 51.2 1-Core 84.9 2-Core 115 49% 83.7 Pts	4-Core 199 8-Core 261 29% 230 Pts	64-Core 250 16% 250 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 43.7% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU) 85,536 User benchmarks, average bench 10% Asus(1043 1091) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 24.3.1 Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	5.83% Terrible	Lighting 6 Reflection 7.2 Parallax 0.3 5% 4.5 fps	MRender 5.9 Gravity 10.9 Splatting 10.5 8% 9.1 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 5.83% Great: 11%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS120G2G0B-00EPW0 120GB 30,897 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 27GB free (System drive) Firmware: UI510000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 2.4 3.4 7.7 22 28 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	36.2% Below average	Read 414 Write 59.3 Mixed 179 SusWrite 38.5 38% 173 MB/s	4K Read 13.9 4K Write 16.3 4K Mixed 11.1 44% 13.8 MB/s	DQ Read 114 DQ Write 65 DQ Mixed 33.9 40% 70.8 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 36.2% Great: 52%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB 452,134 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 627GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 132 128 119 130 130 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	67.6% Good	Read 112 Write 112 Mixed 67.7 SusWrite 124 76% 104 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 1 207% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 67.6% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A5143EB1-CRC 1x4GB 1,996 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	27.4% Poor	MC Read 9.3 MC Write 10 MC Mixed 8.7 27% 9.33 GB/s	SC Read 9.6 SC Write 9.2 SC Mixed 8.7 26% 9.17 GB/s	Latency 153 26% 153 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 27.4% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 11: 0P 0R 2G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
11%	32%	22	86	57	60	15.5"	1280 720	CMN15F5

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUS Laptop X505ZA_X505ZA Builds (Compare 231 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUS Laptop X505ZA_X505ZA

CPU
Ryzen 5 2500UAMDBench 49%, 61,910 samples	200x
Ryzen 3 2200UAMDBench 45%, 15,631 samples	22x
Ryzen 7 2700UAMDBench 52%, 8,291 samples	5x

GPU
Radeon Vega 8 Mobile GraphicsAMDBench 8%, 8,935 samples	166x
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU)AMDBench 10%, 85,536 samples	34x
RX Vega 3 (Ryzen iGPU)AMDBench 5%, 18,674 samples	22x

SSD
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GBBench 72%, 50,765 samples	23x
WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GBWDCBench 45%, 85,321 samples	14x
SD9SN8W128G1002 128GBSandiskBench 66%, 3,521 samples	14x

RAM
8ATF1G64HZ-2G3E1 1x8GBMicronBench 36%, 2,704 samples	66x
M471A5143EB1-CRC 1x4GBSamsungBench 32%, 1,996 samples	26x
M471A5143EB1-CRC Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 8GBSamsungBench 59%, 311 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $288	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16