Asus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING (WI-FI)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive45.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
5 months ago, 1 month ago.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory23.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210712
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 02 '24 at 01:07
Run Duration267 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$110
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
98.8% Outstanding
Memory 75.6
1-Core 167
2-Core 288
96% 177 Pts
4-Core 654
8-Core 958
101% 806 Pts
64-Core 1116
69% 1116 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 98.8%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
EVGA(3842 3667) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.22
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 199
Reflection 179
Parallax 174
162% 184 fps
Gravity 142
Splatting 95.7
102% 119 fps
Poor: 116% Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z32080RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 38 51 38 51 54 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
45.2% Average
Read 411
Write 84.5
Mixed 8.7
SusWrite 49.2
30% 138 MB/s
4K Read 18
4K Write 76.2
4K Mixed 3
71% 32.4 MB/s
DQ Read 154
DQ Write 128
DQ Mixed 15.4
46% 99.3 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 78%
WD Blue SN570 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
168GB free
Firmware: 234110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1457 468 406 453 316 401 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
268% Outstanding
Read 2,093
Write 2,348
Mixed 2,007
SusWrite 584
395% 1,758 MB/s
4K Read 61.9
4K Write 188
4K Mixed 83.7
301% 111 MB/s
DQ Read 1,391
DQ Write 1,116
DQ Mixed 1,220
922% 1,242 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 268%
Great: 300%
MM0500GBKAK 500GB
167GB free
Firmware: HPGC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 67 66 66 68 67 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
42.6% Average
Read 81.3
Write 81.2
Mixed 52
SusWrite 66.8
52% 70.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.1
201% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 61%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$34
396GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 102 103 101 103 102 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
56.9% Above average
Read 96
Write 93.3
Mixed 86.3
SusWrite 102
70% 94.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 76%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$40
238GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 124 123 121 121 121 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
74.4% Very good
Read 137
Write 120
Mixed 21.7
SusWrite 122
72% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
148% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 107%
Seagate Expansion+ 1TB
639GB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 28 24 27 16 4.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
13.8% Very poor
Read 26
Write 29.5
Mixed 17.5
SusWrite 21.7
18% 23.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.9
153% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 71%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 64GB
59GB free, PID 00c4
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 4.6 4.1 5.8 6 6 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 1101
Write 1
Mixed 7
SusWrite 5
186% 278 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Mixed 0
135% 12.1 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4-3200C16-8GVKB Corsair CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 F4-3200C16-8GVKB Corsair CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
65.1% Good
MC Read 26.9
MC Write 15.9
MC Mixed 25.1
65% 22.6 GB/s
SC Read 24.4
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 27.2
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 88
46% 88 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 65 57 120 42.5" 1280 720 ACR0707 CG437K P
Typical ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 9,594 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING (WI-FI) - $199

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $944
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback