Asus X99-A II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics9.62% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive72.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus X99-A II  (all builds)
Memory23.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161108
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateMay 01 '24 at 23:43
Run Duration225 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$110
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
83.8% Excellent
Memory 95.7
1-Core 87
2-Core 199
74% 127 Pts
4-Core 389
8-Core 624
62% 506 Pts
64-Core 789
49% 789 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
MSI(1462 8C98) 2GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 525 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 546.65
Relative performance (0th percentile)
9.62% Terrible
Lighting 13.5
Reflection 4.5
Parallax 9.1
11% 9.03 fps
MRender 2.7
Gravity 11.9
Splatting 9.8
7% 8.13 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 9.62%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS200T2B0A-00SM50 2TB
713GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 411040WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 407 403 308 337 338 351 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
72.4% Very good
Read 340
Write 371
Mixed 199
SusWrite 357
71% 317 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 34.1
4K Mixed 25.5
88% 28.1 MB/s
DQ Read 327
DQ Write 107
DQ Mixed 168
137% 200 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 117%
Wd_black AN1500 1TB
16GB free
Firmware: 10271043
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,414
Write 1870
Mixed 1,327
345% 1537 MB/s
4K Read 35
4K Write 36.4
4K Mixed 36.1
119% 35.8 MB/s
DQ Read 508
DQ Write 98.5
DQ Mixed 123
137% 243 MB/s
Poor: 164% Great: 356%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
166GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 123 119 120 120 124 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
76.7% Very good
Read 146
Write 102
Mixed 98.1
SusWrite 121
86% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 101%
WD Red 10TB (2017)-$419
270GB free
Firmware: 83.H0A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 166 169 163 167 166 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
Read 162
Write 175
Mixed 96.1
SusWrite 166
110% 150 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 1.1
301% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
116% Outstanding
MC Read 46.2
MC Write 43.5
MC Mixed 45.5
129% 45.1 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 23.2
57% 19.9 GB/s
Latency 54.9
73% 54.9 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 116%
Great: 130%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 1: 0P 0R 0G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
1% 20% 5 54 25 60 26.9" 1280 720 GBT2707 AORUS FI27Q-P
Typical X99-A II Builds (Compare 1,430 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-A II - $294

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $683
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback