CMS 4000-0576A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 329%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 332%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 117%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics294% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive289% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemCMS 4000-0576A  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK PRIME B650M-K
Memory17.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231007
Uptime19.2 Days
Run DateMay 01 '24 at 20:47
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D-$310
AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Memory 94.9
1-Core 190
2-Core 381
118% 222 Pts
4-Core 739
8-Core 1337
125% 1038 Pts
64-Core 1,717
106% 1,717 Pts
Poor: 105%
This bench: 117%
Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080-S (Super)-$976
MSI(1462 5118) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5750 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 551.61
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
294% Outstanding
Lighting 446
Reflection 439
Parallax 517
364% 467 fps
MRender 518
Gravity 391
Splatting 244
299% 385 fps
Poor: 279%
This bench: 294%
Great: 314%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar NM620 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN11665
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1881 1858 1912 1943 1918 1925 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
289% Outstanding
Read 1679
Write 2,173
Mixed 1,784
SusWrite 1,906
427% 1,886 MB/s
4K Read 47.4
4K Write 64.4
4K Mixed 54.1
175% 55.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,484
DQ Write 796
DQ Mixed 530
557% 937 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 289%
Great: 386%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
177% Outstanding
MC Read 76.7
MC Write 55.3
MC Mixed 62
185% 64.7 GB/s
SC Read 54.9
SC Write 58.5
SC Mixed 53.5
159% 55.6 GB/s
Latency 58.3
69% 58.3 ns
Poor: 144%
This bench: 177%
Great: 173%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 58: 0P 5R 10G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
58% 49% 37 214 57 165 27" 2560 1369 SAM72FC LS27CG51x
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback