ZR H6104D4G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive118% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemZR H6104D4G  (all builds)
MotherboardZR H6104D4G
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230424
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 01 '24 at 20:09
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User LBN-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12400-$146
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
45.9% Average
Memory 29.1
1-Core 86.5
2-Core 174
49% 96.6 Pts
4-Core 335
8-Core 635
58% 485 Pts
64-Core 928
57% 928 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 106%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nx-512 2280 512GB
136GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.4.8.56
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 201 457 171 164 156 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 764
Write 608
Mixed 496
SusWrite 220
116% 522 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 98
4K Mixed 37.8
148% 55.9 MB/s
DQ Read 689
DQ Write 599
DQ Mixed 236
289% 508 MB/s
Poor: 131%
This bench: 118%
Great: 293%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
KingSpec KS3200D4R13516G 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
36.8% Below average
MC Read 13.6
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 13.2
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 4.9
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 7.3
23% 7.93 GB/s
Latency 231
17% 231 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 5: 0P 0R 1G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
5% 20% 15 197 55 170 0" 1920 1057
Typical H6104D4G Builds (Compare 43 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 141%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 132%
UFO

System: ZR H6104D4G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $620
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback