TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gigabyte GA-A520 AORUS ELITE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 138%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 136%
UFO
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics134% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A520 AORUS ELITE  (all builds)
Memory22.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230322
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 01 '24 at 18:35
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D-$325
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 95
1-Core 160
2-Core 313
103% 189 Pts
4-Core 592
8-Core 1,076
100% 834 Pts
64-Core 1,423
88% 1,423 Pts
Poor: 92% ↑
This bench: 103%
 Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
Gigabyte(1458 405E)
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
134% Outstanding
Lighting 192
Reflection 173
Parallax 166
156% 177 fps
MRender 186
Gravity 135
Splatting 117
116% 146 fps
Poor: 116% ↑
This bench: 134%
 Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar NM620 1TB
92GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9846
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,024
Write 2,426
Mixed 1,601
451% 2,017 MB/s
4K Read 53
4K Write 20
4K Mixed 22.5
120% 31.8 MB/s
DQ Read 32.9
DQ Write 2.4
DQ Mixed 6.1
7% 13.8 MB/s
Poor: 170% Great: 348%
Crucial BX500 480GB-$38
78GB free
Firmware: M6CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 279 41 7.3 7 7.2 7.4 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
76.4% Very good
Read 494
Write 266
Mixed 330
SusWrite 58
64% 287 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 30.3
139% 54.1 MB/s
DQ Read 278
DQ Write 235
DQ Mixed 48.9
93% 187 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑
This bench: 76.4%
 Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3200 3200 C18 Series DDR4 3200 3200 C18 Series 32GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
105% Outstanding
MC Read 48.9
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 39.5
107% 37.4 GB/s
SC Read 31.7
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 39.7
91% 31.8 GB/s
Latency 57.4
70% 57.4 ns
Poor: 79% ↑
This bench: 105%
 Great: 103%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 48 12 240 27" 1920 1009 SAM727A Odyssey G40B
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical GA-A520 AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 721 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A520 AORUS ELITE

CPU
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD  $120Bench 96%, 383,420 samples183x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD  $86Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples179x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD  $200Bench 86%, 635,419 samples67x
GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia  $266Bench 100%, 447,556 samples66x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia  $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples56x
RTX 3070Nvidia  $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples36x
SSD
SNVS500G 500GBKingstonBench 186%, 34,043 samples24x
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples16x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $90Bench 251%, 262,559 samples16x
RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples42x
KF3200C16D4/8GX 2x8GBKingstonBench 88%, 58,684 samples33x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples28x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $426
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback