Wortmann_ag 1009667;2110127

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics43% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive78.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
SystemWortmann_ag 1009667;2110127  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK PRIME H310M-A R2.0
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220614
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 01 '24 at 18:30
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$114
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Memory 91.6
1-Core 117
2-Core 234
84% 147 Pts
4-Core 451
8-Core 698
71% 575 Pts
64-Core 698
43% 698 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Nvidia(10DE 1F82) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43% Average
Lighting 56.2
Reflection 56.2
Parallax 48.8
46% 53.7 fps
MRender 42.4
Gravity 49.9
Splatting 45.2
38% 45.8 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 43%
Great: 46%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN128HAHQ-000L1 128GB
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MVT24L0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 156 151 157 157 157 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
78.9% Very good
Read 428
Write 400
Mixed 194
SusWrite 148
65% 292 MB/s
4K Read 32.3
4K Write 85.6
4K Mixed 37
142% 51.6 MB/s
DQ Read 263
DQ Write 156
DQ Mixed 177
140% 199 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS4G4D240FSB.8FBD2 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
79.2% Very good
MC Read 30.7
MC Write 31.7
MC Mixed 22.9
81% 28.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 28.3
SC Mixed 21.6
62% 21.7 GB/s
Latency 61.7
65% 61.7 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 21.5" 1920 1009 SAM07D2 SA300/SA350
Typical 1009667;2110127 Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht

System: Wortmann_ag 1009667;2110127

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $451
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback