Medion ERAZER i51000/C013

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics44% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMedion ERAZER i51000/C013  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION H110H4-CM2
Memory2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160603
Uptime8.7 Days
Run DateMay 01 '24 at 17:05
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 56%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$79
1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
60.8% Good
Memory 63.7
1-Core 83.2
2-Core 173
60% 107 Pts
4-Core 330
8-Core 360
46% 345 Pts
64-Core 349
22% 349 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Asus(1043 86C1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
44% Average
Lighting 57.8
Reflection 54.5
Parallax 48.3
47% 53.5 fps
MRender 41.1
Gravity 52.2
Splatting 45.9
38% 46.4 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 44%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN256HCHP-00000 256GB
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT2100Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 130 129 137 214 239 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
71.6% Very good
Read 443
Write 81.2
Mixed 124
SusWrite 164
44% 203 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 61.6
4K Mixed 26.6
104% 37.6 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 174
DQ Mixed 211
173% 252 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
378GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 162 162 162 163 164 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
92.4% Outstanding
Read 160
Write 117
Mixed 84
SusWrite 162
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya M2F8G64CC8HD5N-DI 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
29.5% Poor
MC Read 10.1
MC Write 9.7
MC Mixed 9.4
28% 9.73 GB/s
SC Read 7.6
SC Write 9.5
SC Mixed 9.2
25% 8.77 GB/s
Latency 88
45% 88 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 27" 2560 1377 AUS2723 VG27A
Typical ERAZER i51000/C013 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

System: Medion ERAZER i51000/C013

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $277
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback