Asus Z97-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics65.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive32.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
1 month ago, 14 days ago.
MotherboardAsus Z97-C  (all builds)
Memory17.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160310
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 01 '24 at 16:47
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 33%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 1.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
29.8% Poor
Memory 41
1-Core 49
2-Core 52.1
31% 47.4 Pts
4-Core 105
8-Core 132
15% 119 Pts
64-Core 117
7% 117 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.23
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
65.7% Good
Lighting 65.7
Reflection 92.4
Parallax 121
54% 93.1 fps
MRender 96.6
Gravity 120
Splatting 109
89% 109 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TB
412GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 401000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 231 172 202 218 171 200 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
32.2% Below average
Read 184
Write 159
Mixed 9.5
SusWrite 199
31% 138 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 14.3
4K Mixed 8.9
26% 9.2 MB/s
DQ Read 111
DQ Write 91.6
DQ Mixed 103
77% 102 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 117%
WD Green 500GB (2012)
128GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 101 104 97 100 99 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
55.3% Above average
Read 92.4
Write 51.5
Mixed 54.9
SusWrite 100
55% 74.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 3x8GB
3 of 4 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
39.1% Below average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 19.7
MC Mixed 10.3
43% 15.1 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 7.4
SC Mixed 11.1
25% 8.6 GB/s
Latency 304
13% 304 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 144 5 165 31.5" 1280 720 HPN394A OMEN 32q
Typical Z97-C Builds (Compare 756 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97-C - $256

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $898
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback