HP Laptop 15s-eq2xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics7.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Laptop 15s-eq2xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 887A
Memory5.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230802
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateMay 01 '24 at 11:43
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
64.9% Good
Memory 65.8
1-Core 120
2-Core 223
74% 136 Pts
4-Core 353
8-Core 451
52% 402 Pts
64-Core 538
33% 538 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
HP(103C 887A) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.44
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
7.6% Terrible
Lighting 8.1
Reflection 12
Parallax 13.5
7% 11.2 fps
MRender 10.9
Gravity 10.5
Splatting 13
10% 11.5 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.6%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg40znv512g KIOXIA 512GB
432GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP00AE00
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,326
Write 1,409
Mixed 1,247
297% 1,327 MB/s
4K Read 36.3
4K Write 70.8
4K Mixed 47.5
153% 51.5 MB/s
DQ Read 819
DQ Write 420
DQ Mixed 616
459% 619 MB/s
Poor: 107% Great: 213%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP32D4S2S8MR-8 Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE 12GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
57.7% Above average
MC Read 23.5
MC Write 17
MC Mixed 19.9
58% 20.1 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 24.7
SC Mixed 19.4
57% 20 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 15.5" 1280 720 AUO499F
Typical Laptop 15s-eq2xxx Builds (Compare 1,257 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 15s-eq2xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback