MSI MPG X570S CARBON MAX WIFI (MS-7D52)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 218%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 253%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics239% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive50.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D52
MotherboardMSI MPG X570S CARBON MAX WIFI (MS-7D52)  (all builds)
Memory96.3 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220518
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateMay 01 '24 at 11:20
Run Duration251 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$260
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
94.7% Outstanding
Memory 67.2
1-Core 167
2-Core 340
99% 191 Pts
4-Core 652
8-Core 1,258
113% 955 Pts
64-Core 2,123
131% 2,123 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 94.7%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-Ti
MSI(1462 5091) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
239% Outstanding
Lighting 359
Reflection 319
Parallax 401
292% 360 fps
MRender 393
Gravity 311
Splatting 206
238% 303 fps
Poor: 205%
This bench: 239%
Great: 247%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SA510 2.5 1000GB
142GB free
Firmware: 5200
SusWrite @10s intervals: 340 321 334 216 94 61 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
79.5% Very good
Read 471
Write 450
Mixed 389
SusWrite 228
86% 384 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 54.7
4K Mixed 37.6
119% 39.9 MB/s
DQ Read 232
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 3.8
60% 142 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 112%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
205GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVQ0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 66 65 67 68 69 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
50.5% Above average
Read 450
Write 72.5
Mixed 102
SusWrite 67.5
37% 173 MB/s
4K Read 16.9
4K Write 53.8
4K Mixed 21.3
81% 30.7 MB/s
DQ Read 77.3
DQ Write 74.6
DQ Mixed 53.8
46% 68.6 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 121%
Edge Boo st Pro SSD 480GB
201GB free
Firmware: 60EA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 138 142 128 144 132 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
33.6% Below average
Read 197
Write 202
Mixed 120
SusWrite 141
37% 165 MB/s
4K Read 11.3
4K Write 13
4K Mixed 15.1
43% 13.1 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 30.3
DQ Mixed 42
39% 62.8 MB/s
Edge Boo st Pro SSD 480GB
53GB free
Firmware: 60EA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 173 163 171 173 165 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.3% Average
Read 309
Write 228
Mixed 244
SusWrite 169
53% 238 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 14.6
4K Mixed 15.1
61% 17.4 MB/s
DQ Read 130
DQ Write 51.2
DQ Mixed 70.1
57% 83.7 MB/s
PNY CS1030 2TB SSD
114GB free
Firmware: CS103500
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1382 1420 162 68 59 427 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
171% Outstanding
Read 995
Write 1,636
Mixed 957
SusWrite 586
236% 1,044 MB/s
4K Read 47.6
4K Write 90.5
4K Mixed 61
198% 66.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,084
DQ Write 429
DQ Mixed 651
510% 722 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 171%
Great: 308%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX CMK128GX4M4E3200C16 4x31.8GB
4 of 4 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
70.8% Very good
MC Read 26.8
MC Write 25.6
MC Mixed 24.3
73% 25.6 GB/s
SC Read 21.9
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 26.2
61% 21.4 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 151%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 144 34" 2752 1081 GBT3403 G34WQC A
Typical MPG X570S CARBON MAX WIFI (MS-7D52) Builds (Compare 798 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 199%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 218%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG X570S CARBON MAX WIFI (MS-7D52)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,025
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback