Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 47% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	5.89% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	35.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-7800 APU (2014 D.Ka) 15,719 User benchmarks, average bench 41% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	45.9% Average	Memory 65.3 1-Core 58.2 2-Core 105 47% 76 Pts	4-Core 156 8-Core 153 21% 155 Pts	64-Core 153 10% 153 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 45.9% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics 25,284 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Elitegroup(1019 9BCD) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 22.6.1 Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	5.89% Terrible	Lighting 6.9 Reflection 8.7 Parallax 7.1 6% 7.57 fps	MRender 6.3 Gravity 9.5 Splatting 7.6 6% 7.8 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.89% Great: 8%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LF128HCHP-00000 128GB 1,148 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 25GB free (System drive) Firmware: FXT0101Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 33 45 50 53 51 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	35.1% Below average	Read 323 Write 55.1 Mixed 93.4 SusWrite 44.9 28% 129 MB/s	4K Read 18.1 4K Write 12.6 4K Mixed 12.8 50% 14.5 MB/s	DQ Read 161 DQ Write 21.9 DQ Mixed 40.2 42% 74.3 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 35.1% Great: 61%
SSDPR-CL100-480-G3 480GB 934 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 18GB free Firmware: T0910A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 95 155 120 49 67 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	24.2% Poor	Read 170 Write 145 Mixed 164 SusWrite 97.7 32% 144 MB/s	4K Read 4 4K Write 14 4K Mixed 7.6 23% 8.53 MB/s	DQ Read 94.4 DQ Write 90.4 DQ Mixed 37.8 43% 74.2 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 24.2% Great: 95%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 92GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 76 126 160 164 166 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	90% Outstanding	Read 184 Write 183 Mixed 109 SusWrite 129 111% 151 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1.2 234% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 90% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C9 2x8GB 6,948 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	33.2% Below average	MC Read 14 MC Write 7.5 MC Mixed 14.3 34% 11.9 GB/s	SC Read 6.8 SC Write 6.6 SC Mixed 9.7 22% 7.7 GB/s	Latency 112 36% 112 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 33.2% Great: 71%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	130	60	0	34.1"	1280 720	GSM59F1 LG ULTRAWIDE

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16