Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics75.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive158% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZE  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX507ZE
Memory49.2 GB free of 64 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230503
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 01 '24 at 03:53
Run Duration198 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
79.5% Very good
Memory 64.5
1-Core 125
2-Core 258
79% 149 Pts
4-Core 507
8-Core 785
80% 646 Pts
64-Core 901
56% 901 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 102%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050-Ti (Laptop)
Asus(1043 1CCC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2197 MHz, MLim: 3060 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 552.12
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Lighting 103
Reflection 89
Parallax 92.1
84% 94.6 fps
MRender 79.6
Gravity 75.6
Splatting 68.7
60% 74.6 fps
Poor: 42%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 72%
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Asus(1043 1CCC) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4502
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
20.9% Poor
Lighting 24.7
Reflection 29.1
Parallax 30.7
20% 28.2 fps
MRender 26.2
Gravity 34.9
Splatting 22.4
22% 27.8 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 20.9%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme PCIe SSD 2TB
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: EIFM31.4 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1397 1571 1560 981 364 359 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
158% Outstanding
Read 702
Write 1,901
Mixed 1,531
SusWrite 1,039
296% 1,293 MB/s
4K Read 30.6
4K Write 89.1
4K Mixed 42.6
148% 54.1 MB/s
DQ Read 716
DQ Write 220
DQ Mixed 440
332% 459 MB/s
Poor: 156%
This bench: 158%
Great: 529%
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVLQ512HBLU-00B00 512GB
283GB free
Firmware: FXM7201Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 803 886 907 761 487 164 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
127% Outstanding
Read 675
Write 792
Mixed 643
SusWrite 668
157% 695 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 81.3
4K Mixed 34.6
126% 47.1 MB/s
DQ Read 704
DQ Write 220
DQ Mixed 433
327% 453 MB/s
Poor: 111%
This bench: 127%
Great: 253%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Avant AVJ644GU44K6560P09-B 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 4800 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
132% Outstanding
MC Read 49.6
MC Write 58.1
MC Mixed 51.6
152% 53.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 28.3
SC Mixed 22
60% 20.9 GB/s
Latency 137
29% 137 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 10: 0P 1R 1G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
10% 17% 24 212 55 60 31.5" 1280 720 ONN0C94 onn. TV
Typical ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZE Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback